Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage26 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
26 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 12,166 decisions within 5 km, 26 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1545 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
26 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
26 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1545 structured nearby appeal records.
1,545 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Proposed rear storey extension, rear rooflghts, associated internal and external alterations, demolition of existing rear single storey extension, associated site development works to dwelling house.
We, Aoife Coleman and Harry Burton intend to apply to Dublin City Council for permission for development at this site at 14 Saint Joseph's Avenue, Dublin 9, D09E3H4. The development will involve refurbishing the existing house and constructing a new single-storey rear extension, rear Velux roof light along with associated site works. Demolition work will include the removal of recent additions to the existing house, including the rear extension and external shed.
Works to the rear of the house comprising: a single-storey extension of ground floor kitchen area; extension of return at first floor level; a new dormer window to proposed non-habitable attic space; and all associated works.
RETENTION: of amendments to a previously permitted single storey shed (Reg. Ref. 4624/22) comprising of an increase in the overall floor area by approximately 7.3 sqm with 2 No rooflights, 2 No doors to the rear lane and elevational changes including the relocation of the front window and door and reduction in the overall heights all in the rear garden
RETENTION: The development consists of retention of amendments to a previously permitted single storey shed (Reg Ref 4642/22 ) comprising of an increase in the overall floor area by approximately 7.3 sq. m with elevational changes including the relocation of window and doors all in the rear garden.
Planning permission to construct a new single storey detached shed in the rear garden.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 12,166 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 5037/26The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief