Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
53, Kylemore Avenue, Ballyfermot, Dublin 10
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 6,673 decisions within 5 km, 10 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1548 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 5064/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1548 structured nearby appeal records.
1,548 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched6,673Nearby applications
10Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
1,548Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Visual Amenity18
Residential Amenity14
Traffic Sightlines8
Design7
Zoning Contravention6
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3456/23
PERMISSION: For a first floor Utility Room (6.1 sq.m.) over the existing ground floor extension to rear.
5064/22
Permission for a first floor bedroom with terrace over existing ground floor extension to rear.
2180/21
PERMISSION & RETENTION: The development will consist of the proposed construction of a two storey and single storey extension to rear of existing dwelling. The two-storey extension will have a flat roof and the single storey extension will have a pitched roof. Retention permission also sought for flat roof dormer extension to rear of existing roof used for storage purposes. All associated site work included in this application.
3213/25
Part two storey extension to the rear and a porch extension to the front with lean to roof over.
WEB1503/25
A partial first floor extension to side, over existing ground floor extension to side with internal modifications and associated site works
WEB1136/22
The development will consist of a new rear dormer roof structure at the attic top floor and the proposed dormer roof is higher than the house roof ridge, there is a small lower dormer structure which is level with the ridge line to accommodate a stairs to the new attic level, new rooflight to the front slope of the roof and single storey rear extension which is higher that the existing utility/toilet block.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 6,673 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 5064/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief