Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage23 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
23 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,391 decisions within 5 km, 23 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2435 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
23 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
23 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
2435 structured nearby appeal records.
2,435 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: RETENTION: Retention planning permission for: a) change text on sign fascia; b) provide external wall mounted heaters; c) changes to shopfront (minor); d) provide planters; e) make a new window opening; f) serve coffee through window and g) restore granite plinth, wall and railing.
RETENTION: PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Retention permission for: a) Replacement of existing retractable canopy facing Baggot Street Lower, with new canopy having support legs.
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: RETENTION for (a) foldable canopy over the ground floor window facing Lower Fitzwilliam Street; (b) the installation of two no. illuminated projecting signs at the corner of the building (top of higher sign approximately 3550 mm from ground
Planning permission for development at this site if c.0.0048ha, at 'Rock Lane', Baggot Street Lower, Dublin 2 (in laneway to the rear of No's 46, 47 and 48 Baggot Street Lower). The development relates to proposed modifications to part of the wider redevelopment of the site at No.s. 13-30 Fitzwilliam Street Lower, Dublin 2 comprising most of a city block bounded by Fitzwilliam Street Lower, Mount Street Upper, James's Street East and Baggot Street Lower. The proposed development comprises modifications to the development permitted on site under An Bord Pleanála Reference PL29S.244492 (Dublin City Council Reg. Ref. 3052/14), currently under construction. The proposed development consists of the construction of a bin store enclosure (30.5sqm) and associated site development and drainage works above and below ground.
The development will consist of: (A) Installation of openable glazed screens to create a café seating area of circa 66m2 and associated site works.
RETENTION for a reduction in the glazed screen cafe seating area and changes to fenestration from that granted under planning reference 3698/23.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,391 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 5254/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief