Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 8,649 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 1016 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1016 structured nearby appeal records.
1,016 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
The development will consist of the replacement of the existing scrolling internally illuminated double sided 'Metropole' advertising display case with a double sided digital advertising display case and associated works.
RETENTION: The development consists of the retention of a garden boundary wall.
RETENTION: Retain rear single storey extension.
Planning Permission to construct dormer window in attic storage area on rear elevation of roof with flat roof finish.
I, Audrey Baker and Alan Walsh, intend to apply for Permission for development at 17 Violet Hill Drive, Glasnevin, Dublin 11, D11 Y0ET consisting of the demolition of an existing shed to the rear and the construction of a single storey extension to the rear of the existing dwelling. The extension is intended for personal use only by current occupants and will consist of 1 bedroom, 1 bathroom, a kitchen/ living area and storage shed and to include 3no. roof lights. The extension will be accessed from the existing side laneway and the kitchen/ sitting room of the existing dwelling, works to also include for all associated site works.
The retention of the existing scrolling internally illuminated double sided ‘Metropole’ advertising display case mounted on an offset leg.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 8,649 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 5350/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief