Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage33 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
33 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
89/91, Terenure Road North, Terenure, Dublin 6w
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,630 decisions within 5 km, 33 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3293 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1008/23
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3293 structured nearby appeal records.
3,293 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,630Nearby applications
33Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,293Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity8
Traffic Sightlines5
Visual Amenity4
Procedure Invalid3
Design2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1008/23
Change of use from bank use to retail use with wine as primary product for sale, ancillary storage and internal alterations, new shopfront & painted brick, internal shutters, new illuminated fascia signage (c. 2.1sqm) and 2 double side externally illuminated projecting signs (c. 2.4 sqm) all at Ground floor, 89/ 91 Terenure Road North, Dublin 6W
WEB1387/24
Planning Permission for change of use from bank use to 2 retail units, ancillary storage and internal alterations, new shopfronts & painted brick, internal shutters, new illuminated fascia signage (c. 5.2 sqm) all at Ground floor, 89/ 91 Terenure Road North, Dublin 6W.
2224/21
Planning permission for change of use from commercial to residential apartment, window and internal alterations, new open space and railings to rear, all at first floor.
3421/19
Planning permission for the change of front elevation involving change of fenestration of existing restaurant and alteration of porch at Tani Japanese Restaurant.
WEB2140/25
PERMISSION & RETENTION The development will consist/consists of (i) Change of Use of 102sqm ground floor portion of the existing 161sqm two storey end of terrace building from Restaurant to Yoga Studio with a Sauna and Coffee Kiosk. (ii) internal alterations to the Ground Floor Layout and (iii) Retention for the following as built alterations to previously granted layout Ref. No. 2132/18 (iii(a)) retention of as constructed glazed cover to external seating area. (iii(b)) retention of as constructed cover to external stairs and external stores on Level 01. (iii(c)) retention of as constructed screening to level 01 air conditioning units iii(d)) retention of as constructed signage board to North gable elevation (iv) associated signage (v) and all ancillary site works
WEB1640/26
Modify existing Planning Permissions ref. 3180/15 and 2566/19 by change of use from retail at ground floor level to restaurant along with changes to the internal layout and new signage
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,630 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1008/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief