Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Shournagh, Hampstead, Glasnevin, Dublin 9
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 9,272 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1026 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1079/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1026 structured nearby appeal records.
1,026 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched9,272Nearby applications
2Site-linked candidates
11%Nearby refused
1,026Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity7
Other5
Zoning Contravention5
Traffic Sightlines2
Visual Amenity2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1079/21
The construction of 52sqm single storey extension providing store and exercise space to rear of existing two storey house including associated internal and elevational modifications to front, rear and side of dwelling and all associated site works
3659/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the erection of a new mesh type fence 433 metres long and 2.4 metres high located along DCU's southern legal boundary with Elmhurst Nursing Home and Hillside Farm. The proposed fence would incorporate semi-mature hedging on both sides and include 3 no. gate entry points from main campus to allow for future connectivity. The development is located within the curtilage of Protected Structure(s).
2895/21
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Permission for the erection of a new 2.7m high boundary fence surrounding DCU lands. The development will include a new gate entry point from main campus (south of the college residences) and within the curtilage of a protected structure.
2776/20
Permission for proposed ancillary family member accommodation to existing 2 storey detached dwelling incorporating 1. To demolish existing ground floor extensions to side and rear. 2. To construct new single and 2 storey extension to side and single storey ground floor extension to rear, and all associated site works.
WEB1116/22
A) Demolition of existing single story conservatory to rear of property. B) Proposed single story mono-pitch extension to rear of property along with internal modifications to include conversion of existing garage space for habitable use. C) Widening of vehicular site access along with associated site works
WEB1770/24
Planning permission for amendments to the previous planning permission reg.ref. WEB 1903/22 for the construction of a detached 3-storey, 4- bed dwelling, The amendments comprise changes to the fenestration positions and arrangement and size in multiple elevations and changes to the roof design including an increase in the ridge height, changes to the roof pitch, changes to dormer window designs. All at the site to the side.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 9,272 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1079/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief