Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
32, Montrose Crescent, Dublin 5
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 7,084 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 758 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1084/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage758 structured nearby appeal records.
758 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched7,084Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
758Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Zoning Contravention14
Traffic Sightlines7
Visual Amenity7
Residential Amenity6
Design5
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1084/24
Construction of external landscape works to front garden consisting of vehicle driveway, creation of vehicular access, vehicle gates, pedestrian gate and landscaped planters
2785/19
The development will consist of (i) removing the hip roof and replacing it with a gable wall, (ii) building a dormer window in the rear roof, (iii) converting the existing attic storage area to a home office with separate bathroom and stair access from the upper landing level and (iv) all associated internal, site and drainage work.
WEB5093/25
The development consists of the following: 1- demolition of the existing front garden wall to allow for the construction of new vehicular access to the front of the existing dwelling off Ardmore Drive. 2- construction of new pitched roofed porch to the front of the existing dwelling. 3- demolition of existing rear extension and construction of new pitched roof full width extension to the rear of the existing dwelling to include kitchen, living and dining space. The application includes internal alterations and all associated site works, drainage, and landscaping as necessary.
3298/25
Erect a two storey domestic extension and ancillary site works at the rear and two new windows at ground floor in the side gable and new dished pavement in the public footpath for the existing off-street parking and drive-in at the front.
4631/23
The proposed development comprises the erection of the roof mounted PV panels at rooftop level on the Smurfit Building at Beaumont Hospital, comprising a total array of 693 sq.m of PV panels, including a vertically mounted array of 45 sq.m of PV panels to the southern elevation of the rooftop plant room.
WEB1794/23
The development will consist of 1. Construction of a new single storey flat roof front extension to consist of a porch. 2. Construction of a new single storey flat roof rear extension to consist of a dining and lounge area. 3. Modifications to the existing main roof of dwelling to consist of a gable wall build up to the side (incorporating a new side window at attic landing level) and a new flat roof dormer window to the rear, for the provision of an attic conversion for use as a home office & W.C. 4. General remodel and upgrade of the existing dwelling at ground and first floors to suit the proposed layouts. All drainage, structural and associated site works to be implemented.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 7,084 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1084/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief