Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage13 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
13 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
149, Mount Prospect Avenue, Clontarf, Dublin 3
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 6,229 decisions within 5 km, 13 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 726 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1116/19
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage726 structured nearby appeal records.
726 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched6,229Nearby applications
13Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
726Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity12
Visual Amenity8
Zoning Contravention7
Design6
Traffic Sightlines5
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1116/19
The change of use and renovation of existing granny flat to residential use, the creation of a new rear 45m2 private garden for new residential dwelling, increasing the height of existing chimney stack to allow for new stepped back first floor extension with mono pitched roof, increasing the height of existing front boundary walls with new front gates, and all associated site works.
4417/19
Planning permission sought for a single storey granny flat consisting of the conversion and extension of existing extension to the side with velux windows to the front consisting of a living/dining area, a kitchenette and bedroom with ensuite. Widening existing vehicular entrance to the front and the creation of a new pedestrian entrance gate to the back.
4876/23
Planning permission is sought by Karl Duffy for development at No. 140 Mount Prospect Avenue, Clontarf, Dublin 3, D03X942. The development will consist of: (i) Demolition of the single storey extension to the rear of the existing dwelling; (ii) The construction of a part single, part two storey extension to rear and side; (iii) First floor extension to the side with pitched roof over; (iv) Conversion of existing attached garage to side and front of dwelling to habitable space; (v) Construction of a new attic level dormer window to the rear; (vi) Amendments to existing vehicular entrance off Mount Prospect Avenue, including provision of new pedestrian entrance; (vii) New double height bay window to front; (viii) Alterations to all elevations, associated landscaping, boundary treatment and all ancillary and ground works necessary to facilitate development.
2824/21
Planning permission is sought for alterations and extensions to existing dwelling. The application includes the removal of a large single storey rear extension, construction of a new single-storey rear extension, construction of two new bedrooms over the existing garage area, alterations to the existing front elevation including the formation of two new bay windows, formation of a partially covered patio area for outdoor dining, and widening of the existing gateway.
WEB1175/19
Conversion of Attic to storage, including a dormer window to the rear at roof level.
WEB2950/25
Conversion of his attic to storage, including a dormer window to the rear, and a velux roooflight to the front all at roof level.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 6,229 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1116/19The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief