Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage20 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
20 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
5, Saint Broc's Cottages, Donnybrook, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,514 decisions within 5 km, 20 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3056 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1222/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3056 structured nearby appeal records.
3,056 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,514Nearby applications
20Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,056Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity9
Visual Amenity8
Design5
Other4
Traffic Sightlines4
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1746/22
Increased ridge height to existing roof to incorporate attic conversion with dormer to rear and two storey extension to rear incorporating first floor north-east facing balcony and new pedestrian access to side.
WEB1222/22
Increase ridge height to existing roof to incorporate attic conversion with dormer to rear and two storey extension to rear incorporating first floor north-east facing balcony and new pedestrian access to side
WEB1729/25
The development will consist of the demolition of the existing single-storey rear extension and the construction of a new single-storey extension at ground level to the rear and a dormer roof at first floor. It will include lowering the existing internal ground floor by a depth of circa 750mm and the construction of a habitable room in the roof space. The development will include roof lights in the flat roof of the extension and glazed windows to a courtyard. Pedestrian access to the side will be retained and the development will include all associated site works, drainage, landscaping and site services.
3401/20
The development will consist of the following: demolition of existing extension to the rear, construction of a new two-storey extension to the rear with flat roof to tie into existing roof, attic conversion as a fully habitable room, new skylights to front and rear, internal alterations and all associated ancillary site works.
WEB1578/22
RETENTION: Benjamin and Courtney Thomas intend to apply for Retention Permission for development at 25 Pembroke Cottages Dublin 4. Permission for planning retention for the existing extension with flat roof and 1 no. sky light on the flat roof to the rear side of the existing extension and 1 no. Velux rooflight to the rear side of the existing cottage roof.
4596/19
The development will consist of the following: Demolition of existing extension to the rear, construction of a new two-storey extension to the rear with flat roof to tie into existing roof, attic conversion as a fully habitable room, new skylights to the front and rear, internal alterations and all associated ancillary site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,514 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1222/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief