Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
16, Londonbridge Drive, Sandymount, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 12,320 decisions within 5 km, 12 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2279 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1369/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2279 structured nearby appeal records.
2,279 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched12,320Nearby applications
12Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,279Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity6
Visual Amenity5
Design3
Traffic Sightlines3
Density2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1369/21
Proposed attic roof space conversion with roof dormer to rear part of roof and two rooflights to front part of roof, attic level side gable window with associated internal alterations to dwelling house.
WEB1183/19
Proposed attic roof space conversion with roof dormer to rear part of roof and two rooflights to front part of roof with associated internal alterations to dwelling house.
3911/20
Permission for internal house alterations, including a provision of a rear dormer structure and window, 2 front roof windows and repositioning of the existing chimney at the rear, all at an existing house.
WEB2053/22
RETENTION: The development consists of Retention Permission for the removal of a window in the front facade at Lower Ground Level and the replacement of same with double doors.
2858/21
Permission for a new part two-storey and part single storey extension including roof terrace and associated landscaping, all to the rear of the existing, two storey above basement, mid terrace house.
4239/23
Permission for the provision of coffee kiosk, front canopy, 1.8m high screen fencing and customer seating area to the front paving area of the sports injury clinic (permitted by file 3605/21).
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 12,320 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1369/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief