Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage25 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
25 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
24, Ross Street, Stoneybatter, Dublin 7 D07 F6K3
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,756 decisions within 5 km, 25 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1604 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1547/23
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1604 structured nearby appeal records.
1,604 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched11,756Nearby applications
25Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
1,604Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity5
Density1
Traffic Sightlines1
Visual Amenity1
Zoning Contravention1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1547/23
Construction of single storey extension with pitched roof to the side of the dwelling; internal alterations and all ancillary site works.
WEB1112/23
RETENTION:The development to be retained consists of the construction of two single storey extensions to the rear of the house.
4758/19
RETENTION: Planning permission for the retention of a single storey extension to the rear of the existing property and all associated site works.
WEB1102/21
The development will consist of a new extension to the side of the existing dwelling, including alterations to the existing floor plan and side elevation along with all associated site works.
3873/22
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The proposed development will consist of the removal of the new masonry boundary wall constructed on the boundary between No.68 / 66 North Circular Road and replacing it with a set of fixed, painted metal railings; To provide a new set of new railings and gates to delineate the boundary between the front garden area and the public pavement. No works are proposed to the exterior or interior of the existing house. The works the subject of this application are located within the grounds of a Protected Structure (RPS Ref. No.1584).
3901/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: PERMISSION & RETENTION: Planning Permission is sought for the following: removal of existing concrete apron to front garden and installation of new historic style railings and pedestrian gate on granite plinth as boundary to front garden area, new hedge and soft landscaping, new granite pathway and gravel finish, new timber bin store with planted roof. To the rear permission is sought to break down window cill to lower ground floor window to create new door opening, and to fit new roller shutter gate to secure proposed vehicular rear access parking at bottom of rear garden. Retention permission is requested for the following; removal of section of non-original concrete blockwork to rear boundary wall to create vehicular rear access off existing lane, replacement of previous timber access stairs to rear garden with new raised deck and access stairs, and replacement of non-original PVC window and timber door with new hardwood French door and window.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,756 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1547/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief