Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,666 decisions within 5 km, 10 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1428 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1428 structured nearby appeal records.
1,428 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Proposed widening of pedestrian access to form vehicular access driveway to front garden with associated site development works
The development will consist of an attic conversion including a dormer window to rear and rooflight to front of existing roof.
The alterations to the roof profile to build up the gable wall creating a ‘Dutch’ hip roof, the conversion of the attic space to dwelling storage / ancillary spaces with a dormer roof construction to the rear, all internal modifications and all associated site works.
Planning permission is sought by Denise & Alan McGeough for the following works: (i) Construction of a part single storey part two storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling with flat roofs (ii) Formation of dormer window to rear of existing pitched roof (iii) Associated site & landscaping works necessary to facilitate the development all at 46 Clonturk Park, Dublin 9, D09 H772.
The development consists of; a) The demolition of the existing single storey extension, the boiler house and external WC to the rear of the property; b) the construction of a two story extension to the rear of the property incorporating a kitchen area on the ground floor and bedroom on the first floor and; c) the relocation of the existing pedestrian gate on the rear boundary wall of the property to a new location on the rear boundary wall of the property. This is all together with associated site works.
The development will consist of the removal of two existing roof windows from the rear roof of an existing house and the construction of a new dormer with one openable window, all above an existing attic conversion comprising non-habitable storage space, with all associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,666 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1663/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief