Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,185 decisions within 5 km, 8 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1398 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1398 structured nearby appeal records.
1,398 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Proposed alternative window design to that outlined in condition 3b of the previously approved extension works (planning Ref: WEB1024/22) along with a new rooflight to eastern extension roof slope and associated site works.
Demolition of existing single storey flat roof extension and store to rear. Proposed two story pitched roof extension to the rear along with associated internal modifications and site works.
PERMISSION & RETENTION: The development will consist of: a) Planning Permission for modifications to the existing boundary wall between 25 and 25A Hollybrook Grove and; b) Retention Permission for the Change of Use of a single storey Special Needs School (Planning Application Ref: 3104/00) to a Residential Dwelling including retention of new mono-pitch roof, upgraded from flat roof.
Permission for the change of use of the existing basement area 69.5m2 from apartment to dental practice.
Permission for the removal of condition 4 of the previously granted planning permission 1896/04 relating to the dental surgery and the residency and ownership of the building.
Proposed front and rear single storey extension, proposed side and rear two storey extension, associated internal & external alterations, replacement windows, external insulation system, proposed widening of existing vehicular access to form wider driveway access to front garden, removal of side attached garage and back garden shed and associated site development works to dwelling house.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,185 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1663/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief