Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage44 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
44 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
30-31, Liffey Street Lower, Dublin 1
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,173 decisions within 5 km, 44 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1912 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1667/25
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1912 structured nearby appeal records.
1,912 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,173Nearby applications
44Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
1,912Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity3
Design1
Procedure Invalid1
Traffic Sightlines1
Visual Amenity1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1667/25
The reinstating of the ground floor windows to the north elevation in their original openings, the fitting of new shop front and signage to east elevation, the relocation of the existing air handling units to the roof, internal alterations to include the fitting of a new lift, and the construction of new stairs, the use of the ground floor as retail and the 1st floor as offices and all associated site works
4312/23
RETENTION: Continuation of use: Taurus Management Consultancy Limited intend to apply for retention of the existing ancillary use to the existing licenced premises at 37 Strand Street Great, Dublin 1 (rear of 35 Lower Liffey Street - The Grand Social). Permission is sought for public access to the building through existing circulation routes from Strand Street Great into the existing public house through No. 37 Strand Street Great.
WEB1645/20
The development will consist of the installation of an ATM machine to the existing shop front to the East elevation.
4577/19
RETENTION: The development consists of change of use of ground floor dining area and first floor storage area to late night bar and music venue.
3830/20
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Permission for development at 36 Strand Street Great (Yamamori Restaurant) and the rear of 39 Ormond Quay Lower (Protected Structure), Dublin 1. The development will consist of the ancillary late night use of the existing ground floor restaurant/bar for nightclub use, and for the change of use of the rear first floor area from permitted storage use to bar and seating area at 36 Strand Street Great. Permission is also sought for change of use of the existing private open space originally designated for use of apartments at rear of 39 Lower Ormond Quay, to a smoking area associated with the adjoining existing restaurant garden for day and night-time use. Complimentary amenity space will be provided for the apartments at the rear of 39 Ormond Quay on an existing roof space over the existing restaurant at first floor level as a planted roof terrace and seating area and all associated site works and services.
WEB1473/19
Works involved with removal of the existing shopfront façade, feature piers and plinth, glazing and entrance door and replacing with new modern facia, piers and shopfront glazing to ground
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,173 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1667/25The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief