Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage17 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
17 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
18, Conquer Hill Road, Clontarf, Dublin 3 D03 DC97
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
10% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 7,548 decisions within 5 km, 17 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 915 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1673/23
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage915 structured nearby appeal records.
915 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched7,548Nearby applications
17Site-linked candidates
10%Nearby refused
915Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Zoning Contravention4
Visual Amenity2
Other1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1673/23
The development will consist of the provision of temporary customer seating to front of the existing public house ‘Grainger’s Pebble Beach,’ including screen planter, retractable overhead canopy and all associated site works, on a site area of 0.0353 ha.
WEB1868/22
The development will consist of the provision of a screened enclosure to the existing external seating area to the front and side of the existing premises that will include a retractable overhead canopy and all associated site works.
WEB1627/19
RETENTION: The development will consist of the retention of the existing boundary wall with timber screen above and timber gate to the side of the house on Conquer Hill Avenue and Conquer Hill Road.
4143/23
Permission is sought for single storey extension to the side and rear of existing dwelling with amendments to existing side boundary wall & ancillary site works.
4335/23
Permission for the following in the rear garden of the above address. Planning permission to include the following: demolition of existing single storey garage/shed in rear garden facing out onto laneway in rear garden of no. 256 Clontarf Road. Permission required for the erection a two storey fully serviced detached flat roof dwelling mews with roof-lights over first floor. An adjoining domestic garage under the first floor facing out onto the laneway. Connection to existing drainage and surface water and all ancillary site works.
3173/25
The development will consist of the demolition of an existing single-storey extension and the construction of a two storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling with amendments to existing rear boundary wall and ancillary site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 7,548 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1673/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief