Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage9 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
9 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
10, Temple View Downs, Clarehall, Dublin 13 D13 E0Y1
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 5,293 decisions within 5 km, 9 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 669 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1772/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage669 structured nearby appeal records.
669 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched5,293Nearby applications
9Site-linked candidates
8%Nearby refused
669Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity32
Visual Amenity29
Zoning Contravention24
Design23
Traffic Sightlines16
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1772/22
Convert existing attic space to study / storage room with new dormer and window to rear and to alter existing gable roof profile, raising gable wall to mini Dutch hip roof profile with window.
WEB1225/21
Proposed change of roof profile from hipped roof to full apex roof to allow room in attic for a playroom and storage.
WEB1733/23
Convert existing attic space to study / storage room with new dormer and window to gable elevation and roof light to rear
WEB1500/21
The development will consist/consist of: The conversion of existing attic to study/ store, with new dormer roof to rear façade & 2 No Roof lights to front facade, including all associated infrastructure and site development works.
3183/20
Planning permission to demolish conservatory attached to rear of house and construct extension to kitchen attached to rear of house with pitched roof finish and construct new toilet attached to side of house with pitched roof finish both at ground floor level.
WEB2008/26
RETENTION PERMISSION: The development consists of the provision of a fenced enclosure (c. 346 sq.m) accommodating parking for 8 no. delivery vans and electric vehicle (EV) charging facilities and all associated site development works located to the rear of Clarehall Shopping Centre.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 5,293 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1772/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief