Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
94, Seafield Road East, Clontarf, Dublin 3
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 7,322 decisions within 5 km, 16 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 863 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB1783/20
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage863 structured nearby appeal records.
863 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched7,322Nearby applications
16Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
863Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Zoning Contravention6
Residential Amenity4
Design2
Visual Amenity2
Other1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1783/20
The construction of a new detached single storey garden room within the rear garden of the existing house, landscaping and all ancillary works.
WEB1283/23
A one storey extension to the rear and a two story extension to the side.
WEB2633/24
Demolition of existing conservatory extension and plant room and construction of new single-storey extensions to south and north elevations, new bay window, new rooflights, alterations of existing windows, widening of the vehicular entrance along front boundary and associated site developments.
WEB1478/22
Alterations and extension of the existing semi-detached dwelling at 91 Seafield Road East, Clontarf East, Dublin 3, D03 HX51, and the works will comprise of the following: a) The demolition of existing single storey extensions to the rear b) The demolition of the double storey lean-to extension (including chimney) and single storey garage to front c) The construction of a new double storey extension to the side of the existing dwelling d) The construction of a new part single and part double storey extension to the rear e) The construction of an attic dormer extension to the rear (not for habitable use – storage only) f) The widening of the existing vehicular opening from 2.6m to 3.2m g) All Internal alterations h) All associated site & landscaping works The proposed works result in an increase in habitable floor area from 128sq.m to 204sq.m.
WEB1016/26
To widen existing vehicular access to front of property & all associated site development works.
WEB1473/21
1st floor dormer extension to rear of existing dwelling, including new gable wall in rear elevation. This is similar to previously approved application Ref. No. 3480/13
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 7,322 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1783/20The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief