Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage9 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
9 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
53, Foxfield Park, Raheny, Dublin 5
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 4,191 decisions within 5 km, 9 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 570 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB2009/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage570 structured nearby appeal records.
570 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched4,191Nearby applications
9Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
570Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity27
Visual Amenity25
Design20
Traffic Sightlines11
Zoning Contravention11
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB2009/24
RETENTION: Retention permission for single story side extension.
WEB1574/22
Demolition of part of an existing single storey rear/side extension and for construction of a single storey flat roof extension to the rear/side, new single storey pitched roof porch to the front, conversion of existing side garage and construction of a 1st floor pitched roof extension over the existing side garage and for widening of existing driveway entrance and footpath dishing and all associated works.
4869/22
Planning permission for development consisting of: (1) the formation of a new family flat within the existing and proposed structures, (2) the construction of a new single storey first floor extension with pitched roof, including 4 roof lights, to the side/rear of the existing two storey semi-detached dwelling (over the existing single storey extension and garage conversion at ground floor level, (3) the construction of a single storey extension at ground floor level, with a flat roof, including 2 roof lights, to the rear of the house, (4) alterations to the existing internal layouts and minor adjustments to the front and rear elevation of the existing structure, (5) all associated site development works.
4235/24
For the construction of a single storey extension to the front, side and rear, with all associated site works.
WEB1103/24
Planning permission is sought for the construction of new single storey extensions to Front and Rear and alterations to existing single storey extension to side, new entrance canopy to front, new bicycle storage to front garden, widening of existing vehicular access and all associated site works at 138 Foxfield Park, Raheny, Dublin 5 for Neil Arthur and Eva Forman.
3316/21
Planning permission for the development consists of a single storey front facing extension.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 4,191 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB2009/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief