Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage66 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
66 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,186 decisions within 5 km, 66 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2094 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
66 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
66 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
2094 structured nearby appeal records.
2,094 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Permission for alterations to the existing front elevation to include a new shopfront and associated signage together with a projecting clock mounted at high level on the facade.
Development will consist of forming an internal opening between 33 and 34 Wicklow Street and associated works.
Planning Permission is sought for the careful removal of existing hardwood timber sliding sash and casement windows and replacement thereof with new hardwood timber framed double glazed sliding sash and casement windows to match existing fenestration patterns to a total of 14 No. windows to the Wicklow Street facing façade only at the first and second levels of the existing 3 storey plus converted attic over ground level buildings 33 & 34 Wicklow Street, Dublin 2 and at the first, second and third floor levels of the existing 3 storey over ground level building at 35 Wicklow Street, Dublin 2.
Planning permission for a material change of use from office to retail use at first floor level, together with a single storey extension (retail, 45 sqm) located at first floor level to the rear, an extension of the basement level (retail, 12.8 sqm) to the rear together with a new staircase linking basement, ground and first floor levels with links into 4 Glendenning Lane to the rear of the property. A new shopfront on Wicklow Street with associated signage, all at 12 Wicklow St. Dublin 2.
PERMISSION AND RETENTION: For planning permission for alterations to the existing front façade at ground floor level to include a new shopfront, new signage to replace existing and retention of the existing lotto signage, all at 25 Wicklow Street, Dublin 2 - D02 PY82.
Removing the existing signage and replacing with a new shopfront sign. New sign to consist of backlit individual stainless steel letters. The building is located within the South City Retail Quarter Architectural Conservation Plan.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,186 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB2191/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief