Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage11 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
11 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
28 Sundrive Road, Crumlin, Dublin 12, D12 K0W0
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,246 decisions within 5 km, 11 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3005 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB2687/25
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3005 structured nearby appeal records.
3,005 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,246Nearby applications
11Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,005Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity6
Visual Amenity3
Design2
Other2
Procedure Invalid2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB1396/26
Amendment to previously granted planning permission Ref. WEB2687/25 comprising the widening of the existing front vehicular access and the construction of a new first-floor flat roof side extension.
WEB2687/25
Single-storey flat-roof rear extension. Conversion of garage into office and storage space, including a new front-facing window. New front door installation.
2783/21
Planning permission for change of use at first floor level from restaurant use to residential use by forming 4 double bedroom apartment units and alternating front and rear elevations with provision of 2 recessed balconies to the front and adaptation of existing flat roof into 2 terraces to the rear plus 2 rear extensions of 6.7m2 in total. There will also be demolition of internal staircase (no. 4) and elevator resulting in forming a new separate commercial unit on the ground floor.
WEB1882/24
The development for permission will consist of: Construction of a first floor extension with a hipped roof over the existing garage to the side All associated ancillary, site and landscaping works. The development for retention permission consists of: Conversion and extension of the single storey garage to the side/rear with a new flat roof over including new windows/doors to the front and rear.
WEB1383/21
Planning permission is sought by Roisin Byrne and Rory Curtis at 95 Blarney Park, Dublin 12, D12 W2F8, for the: a) demolition of existing garage and sheds; b) construction of 30.5 sqm single storey, flat roofed extension to the side and rear of the existing house; c) provision of obscured glazed window at side elevation of first floor level; d) provision of 2 no rooflights to existing pitched roof; e) provision of pedestrian access gate; f) and associated site works.
4691/22
Planning permission for development consisting of the demolition of an internal wall structure between Unit 1 and Unit 2 to form one combined unit of 141m2, change of use of unit 1 and unit 2 from retail use to dental clinic, elevational changes to include new glazing and new signage and all associated works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,246 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB2687/25The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief