Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
St. Lukes Hospital, Highfield Road, Dublin 6, D06 HH36
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,560 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3600 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- WEB2702/25
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3600 structured nearby appeal records.
3,600 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched14,560Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
3,600Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity9
Traffic Sightlines5
Visual Amenity5
Procedure Invalid4
Design3
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
WEB2702/25
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development is proposed on the curtilage of a protected structure and will consist of minor demolitions to the existing hospital, including the removal of four windows, one door, and an external ramp, to facilitate the construction of a single-storey extension with a roof-mounted air handling unit and associated screening. The 84 sq.m extension, located to the rear of the hospital within an existing courtyard, will comprise one gamma camera scanning room, one control room, and an associated lobby. The development will also include all boundary treatments, pedestrian access, landscaping, and associated site development works.
3631/20
Planning permission at a c. 350sqm site to the rear of 23 Oaklands Drive, Rathgar, Dublin 6, bounded by St. Luke's Hospital to the south, Woodbine Cottage to the east, 21 and 23 Oaklands Drive to the north and 31 Oaklands Drive to the west. The proposed development will provide for 2no. two storey 3-bedroom dwellings of c.144sqm GFA (House A) and c.152sqm GFA (House B), respectively. Both dwellings will have 1st floor screened private balconies. The application will provide for all other site development works, site services, drainage and engineering works necessary to facilitate the proposed development.
3187/22
Permission for the construction of 2 storey 2-bed detached dwelling house with amended landscaping, & creation of vehicular access & parking with new boundaries and associated site works.
WEB1533/24
A) the construction of a new single storey extension with flat roof to the rear of the existing ground floor apartment of the two storey semi-detached dwelling and b) all associated site, landscaping, drainage and ancillary works.
WEB1620/19
RETENTION: The development consists of the retention of alterations to window layout and construction of additional window on the east elevation made to the ground floor level maisonette of the existing semi-detached two storey apartment building.
WEB1759/21
The development will consist of an attic conversion with new dormer window and roof light to rear and a roof light to side in existing roof hip.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,560 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB2702/25The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief