Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,275 decisions within 5 km, 18 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3321 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
3321 structured nearby appeal records.
3,321 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Permission is sought for the alterations to the previously approved planning application 4000/23. The alterations include minor changes to the elevational treatment and the inclusion of a new ESB kiosk substation at Rathgar Villas at Rathgar Avenue, Dublin 6, D06 X3T0 and 27A Rathgar Avenue, Dublin 6, D06 T0X6 which are to the rear of nos. 27, 28 & 29 Rathgar Avenue and adjoin Rathgar Villas by E.W.R. Rathgar Ltd, Ross Dunne & Joseph Dunne.
Permission is sought for the demolition of existing single storey vehicle workshop and existing single storey light industrial shed; the subsequent construction of 7 no. 3 storey, 4 bedroom terraced houses, with roof terraces to front and rear, associated site & landscaping works and new vehicular access from Rathgar Villas at Rathgar Avenue, Dublin 6, D06 X3T0 and 27a Rathgar Avenue, Dublin 6, D06 T0X6 which are to the rear of nos. 27, 28 & 29 Rathgar Avenue and adjoin Rathgar Villas.
RETENTION: Retention planning permission for attic conversion with 2 no. dormers to front of existing roof. Planning Permission for dormer to rear roof of existing attic conversion to create 2 no. additional habitable bedrooms all with associated ancillary works.
The development will consist of: a) Removal of existing fencing, gates and site clearance. b) Construction of 2 no. 2 storey, 3 bedroomed dwellings incorporating off-street car parking. c) All associated site works including all boundary treatments, hard and soft landscaping, associated external alterations and connections to services and utilities.
Planning permission for proposed widening of existing driveway entrance with associated ancillary landscape work.
RETENTION: PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Planning permission is sought for the retention of a privacy screen, on an existing rear boundary wall, within the curtilage of a protected structure.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,275 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB5490/25The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief