Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Cresent Road, Rogerstown, Rush, Co. Dublin
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
25% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,110 decisions within 5 km, 12 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 193 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- F20A/0536
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage193 structured nearby appeal records.
193 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
1,110Nearby applications
12Site-linked candidates
25%Nearby refused
193Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity26
Design19
Visual Amenity17
Traffic Sightlines16
Ecology11
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
F20A/0536
Permission for a new detatched dormer style dwelling with vehicular e
F21A/0322
Construction of one new flat roof two storey house, with new boundary
F20B/0297
Permission is sought to retain existing single storey extension to the
F22A/0074
Construction of new detached storey and a half dwelling house, detache
F18A/0440
Permission for a new dwelling to be located to the north of existing d
F20A/0280
Retention permission to retain slight increase in ridge height of roof
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,110 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record F20A/0536The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief