Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage9 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
9 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
25 Hilltown Grove, River Valley, Swords, Co Dublin
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
15% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,748 decisions within 5 km, 9 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 323 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- F21B/0038
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverage2 current citations from the Fingal County Council development plan, each with section, page and source URL.
2 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage3 of 4 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage323 structured nearby appeal records.
323 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Fingal County Council development plan.
2 matched1,748Nearby applications
9Site-linked candidates
15%Nearby refused
323Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Visual Amenity30
Residential Amenity29
Design27
Zoning Contravention24
Traffic Sightlines20
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
F21B/0038
Permission for development to construct a single storey porch extensio
F23A/0479
The development will consist of:
F24A/0205
The development will consist of a single storey side/rear extension to
F25A/0367E
Single extension to side of existing dwelling
F23B/0024
The development will consist of the construction of a new
F17A/0571
A. Two storey detached house. B. All associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,748 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record F21B/0038The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief