Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage9 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
9 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 3,915 decisions within 5 km, 9 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 816 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
9 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
9 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matched2 current citations from the Fingal County Council development plan, each with section, page and source URL.
2 matched3 of 4 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
816 structured nearby appeal records.
816 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Fingal County Council development plan.
2 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
The Moldovan Retail Store Ltd. seeks full planning permission for part
The Moldovan Retail Store Ltd seeks (a) Retention permission for retai
Retention of the single storey structure to the east.
Planning permission for development at Unit 2, Porters Road, Coolmine
The development is for retention of (a) 3 no. mobile kiosk units for u
Planning Permission is sought by Carinish Ltd for development at Unit
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 3,915 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record FW19A/0020The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief