Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage13 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
13 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
2 Mount Eustace Green, Tyrrelstown, Dublin 15, D15 K7H2
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 2,454 decisions within 5 km, 13 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 323 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- FW20B/0158
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverage2 current citations from the Fingal County Council development plan, each with section, page and source URL.
2 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage3 of 4 layers are loaded for Fingal County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage323 structured nearby appeal records.
323 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Fingal County Council development plan.
2 matched2,454Nearby applications
13Site-linked candidates
14%Nearby refused
323Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Visual Amenity50
Residential Amenity44
Traffic Sightlines28
Design22
Zoning Contravention22
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
FW26A/0069E
Retention Permission for a detached rear garden shed formally intended
FW23A/0263
The development will consist of planning permission for a two-bedroom
FW25A/0025E
Retention permission for a single-storey shed with flat roof located
FW24A/0147E
Planning permission for a two-two storey side extension for extended l
FW25A/0104E
The development consists/will consist of the retention of existing roo
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 2,454 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record FW20B/0158The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief