Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage21 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
21 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
5 Limelawn Hill, Clonsilla, Dublin 15, D15 T0H6
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 3,866 decisions within 5 km, 21 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 823 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- FW26A/0178E
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage823 structured nearby appeal records.
823 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
3,866Nearby applications
21Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
823Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Visual Amenity63
Residential Amenity50
Design25
Zoning Contravention22
Traffic Sightlines14
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
FW26A/0178E
Planning Permission for raising of the existing hipped roof to provide
FW20B/0173
Permission for timber framed playroom at the end of rear garden.
FW21B/0022
Permission for the raising of the existing hipped roof to provide a ga
FW24A/0470E
Planning permission for an attic conversion with hip to gable roof and
FW21B/0025
An attic conversion to include a dormer window structure at attic leve
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 3,866 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record FW26A/0178EThe site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief