Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,751 decisions within 5 km, 7 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 111 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
111 structured nearby appeal records.
111 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
For (a) change of use from retail warehouse to fast food drive thru restaurant together with elevation alterations (b) extension to northern elevation and projecting canopy to west elevation (c) two illuminated free standing signs and building mounted illuminated signage (d) height restriction barrier sign (e) Alterations to car park layout including new retaining wall to site boundary and all associated site works
(A) change of use from tile shop to fast food drive thru restaurant together with elevation alterations, (B) extension to southern elevation and projecting canopy to south and west elevations, (C) Two illuminated free standing signs and building mounted illuminated signage, (D) height restriction barrier sign, (E) Alterations to car park layout including 3 additional bus parking spaces and all associated site works
To permit the retail offer from the retail store permitted under planning permission ref: 99/515 to include the sale of convenience goods from up to 17% of the permitted floor area and non-fashion clothing, including, pyjamas, novelty socks, winter hats and gloves, from up to 3% of the permitted floor area at
The change of use of units 3 and 4 from a wholesale warehouse retail unit open to trade and the general public to a retail warehouse use, signage and all associated works
Development consisting of replacement of existing fascia signs with new brand signs, addition of a customer entrance feature, repainting of building & general refurbishment
Development consisting of the construction of a new retail warehouse unit, signage and all associated works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,751 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 17474The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief