Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
ANNAGAP , ANNASCAUL , CO KERRY
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
18% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 101 decisions within 5 km, 6 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 12 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 191206
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage12 structured nearby appeal records.
12 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
101Nearby applications
6Site-linked candidates
18%Nearby refused
12Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
191206
CONSTRUCT A GLAMPING SITE WITH SHEPARDS HUTS AND A WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM TO SERVICE THE SITE
19384
CONSTRUCT A GLAMPING SITE WITH SHEPHERDS HUTS AND/OR GLAMPING PODS, AND FOR A CHANGE OF USE OF THE CONFERENCE ROOM/CANTEEN IN PART OF THE WORK SHOP TO A HOLIDAY AND LEISURE VISITOR CENTRE
21500
CONSTRUCT A GLAMPING SITE WITH 13 UNITS MADE UP OF SHEPHERDS HUTS, TRAIN CARRIAGE UNITS AND 1 COMMUNAL FACILITIES HUT. CHANGE THE USE OF THE UPPER NORTHERN SECTION OF THE CONOR/CREAN CENTRE TO USE AS A RECEPTION AREA FOR THE GLAMPING SITE AND INSTALL A WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM TO SERVICE THE SITE
2460231
PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT TO RENOVATE AND EXTEND THE EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY SITE WORKS
201013
ERECT AN INFORMATION SIGN INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY SITE WORKS
21638
(A) AS CONSTRUCTED DORMER WINDOW TO REAR ELEVATION (B) ALL STRUCTURES AND ASSOCIATED ANCILLARY SERVICES WITHIN REVISED SITE BOUNDARIES
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 101 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 191206The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief