Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 341 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 27 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
27 structured nearby appeal records.
27 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
To construct an extension to existing dwelling house, namely additional bedroom and bathroom, including all necessary site works
Retention of Ground Floor Extension to front side of house; Retention of use of extension at (a) as Hairdressing Salon at
To excavate the high level front garden to form a new area for car parking and to incorporate a new stairs and new external stair lift and all associated site works on lands at
For development. The development to be retained consists of the following deviations to the approved planning drawings (Ref. 19/34): 1. Changing the 10 degree pitched roof on the rear extension to a flat roof and 2. Changing the glazed door on the side (south-west) elevation of the rear extension to a window
For a single storey extension to the rear and slightly to the west of the main structure of the house and all other ancillary internal and external works at the existing terraced house
For the erection of an extension and alterations to existing dwelling. The extension will consist of a second storey extension onto existing single storey extension and modifications to front elevation of existing single storey extension and construction of a further two storey return extending to the rear of the existing single storey extension and all associated site works. The property is a Protected Structure No. C609 (NIAH No. 12317051)
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 341 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20692The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief