Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,052 decisions within 5 km, 15 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 89 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Louth County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
89 structured nearby appeal records.
89 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Louth County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Retention Permission for the erection of a glazed balcony to the rear of my existing dwelling. Full Permission for alterations to the existing balcony and all associated site development works.
Retention permission for the erection of a glazed balcony to the rear of existing dwelling, full permission for alterations to the existing balcony and all associated site development works
Retention permission for various alterations to an existing dwelling house. The alterations include change of house type from single storey to dormer style dwelling with associated first floor accommodation, ground floor extensions to the eastern and western elevations, reconfigurations of the original elevations, replacement of the original roof, removal of the covered garage/storage area and all associated site development works
Retention permission for the erection of a glazed balcony to the rear of existing dwelling and boundary treatments with full permission sought for new site entrance arrangement including entrance pier with sliding gate and all associated development works.**** SPLIT DECISION 1.To GRANT retention permission for boundary treatments and full permission for new site entrance arrangement including entrance pier with sliding gate subject to the 3 2. To REFUSE Retention Permission for the erection of a glazed balcony to the rear of existing dwelling.
Permission for alterations and extension to the existing ground floor plan, first floor extension to an existing house and permission for a new domestic garage to the rear and associated site development works
Permission for a new extension and alterations to existing dwelling house and all associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,052 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 22986The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief