Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
7% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 283 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 6 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Clare County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
6 structured nearby appeal records.
6 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Clare County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Of the following (a) the existing Covid structure as covered external shelter and play area and (b) the use of the ground floor of existing house as a creche/montessori and removal of condition 3 of granted Planning Permission P04/626
Of the following works, (A) The use of the ground floor of the existing dwelling as a childcare / Montessori Centre, (B) The erection of a steel structure for use as a shade / covered play area, and (C) The erection of a steel shed for use as a store, all with associated site works
Of 1)an astro turf pitch, including associated fencing and netting 2) PERMISSION for development which will consist of a new astro turf pitch including associated fencing, netting and ancillary site works
For construction of a single storey extension to the rear of existing school comprising classroom accommodation, sensory garden and play area, revised parking, landscaping, drainage, revised astro surfacing, hurling wall and related works to existing school
To construct an extension to the rear of her existing garage with all ancillary works
To construct an entrance, dwellinghouse and garden shed together with all associated site development works and connections to public services
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 283 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2460666The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief