Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
19% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 200 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 13 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Kerry County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
13 structured nearby appeal records.
13 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Kerry County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
I, Denise O’Leary, wish to apply for retention permission for the following completed works at Paradise Found, Reennanallagane, Glenbeigh, Co. Kerry, V93 FT6X: 1) Alterations to existing south and east elevations as constructed; 2) Roof lights to east elevation as constructed; 3) Domestic ancillary garage as constructed; 4) Retention of ridge level and finished floor level of dwelling house as constructed; 5) Existing site entrance as constructed, and 6) all other associated completed site works and Planning Permission for an upgrade in the wastewater treatment and disposal system including a new percolation area as shown in drawings received on 21/05/25
CONSTRUCT A BAY WINDOW TO HIS HOUSE
CONSTRUCT A DOMESTIC STORAGE AND GENERAL PURPOSES SHED
TO RETAIN THE HARDSTAND ACCESS ROAD WITH STONE AND CHIPPINGS AS CONSTRUCTED WITH ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS
ERECT A NEW BUNGALOW WITH ATTIC ACCOMMODATION COMPLETE WITH SEPTIC TANK AND PERCOLATION AREA AND ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS ASSOCIATED WITH SAME INCLUDING THE UPGRADING OF THE EXISTING PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD AND NEW ENTRANCE ON TO SAME ALL
(A) RETAIN DORMER HOUSE AS BUILT (B) PERMISSION TO (1) COMPLETE HOUSE WITH CHANGES TO ELEVATIONS (11) FURTHER DEVELOP ATTIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS SUBMITTED (111) CONSTRUCT GARAGE WITH VELUX WINDOWS AND (1V) INSTALL A WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SAND POLISHING FILTER
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 200 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2460899The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief