Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Ballinlig , Broadford , Co. Kildare
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
25% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 190 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 14 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2460939
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage14 structured nearby appeal records.
14 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
190Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
25%Nearby refused
14Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2460939
For (A) development of a family apartment within the existing house and construction of a single storey extension to the rear (north east) elevation, (B) construction of front porch to serve the existing house with alterations to the front (south west) Elevation consisting of removal of existing bay windows and the insertion of new window fenestration throughout, (C) construction of single storey extension to rear (north west) and side (south east) Elevations, (D) the installation of an Oakstown BAF wastewater treatment plant with polishing filter percolation area, (E) removal of existing single storey timber clad structure currently been used as a hair dressing salon and (F) Retention Permission for the partially built structure to the rear of the property and for the completion of the construction to contain the relocated hair dressing salon and garage/ store for domestic use
19945
(a) Erection of single storey type house; (b) Garage/fuel store for domestic use; (c) The installation of a septic tank and percolation area and (d) Installation of new recessed entrance and all associated site works
2542
For (a) erection of single storey type house; (b) garage/fuel store for domestic use; (c) the installation of a septic tank and percolation area and (d) installation of new recessed entrance and all associated site works
201446
To demolish existing agriculture storage shed and ancillary site works and planning permission to construct new replacement agricultural storage shed and ancillary site works
19579
Construction of a single storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling and all associated ancillary site works. Revised by significant further information consisting of; New percolation area
2259
To remove Existing Hill and improve the Agricultural Usability of the existing land and ancillary site works. Following a requirement from the Planning Authority a Natura Impact Statement has been submitted
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 190 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2460939The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief