Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Carha , Rehins , Castlebar
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 254 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 13 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 23640
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage13 structured nearby appeal records.
13 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched254Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
8%Nearby refused
13Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
23640
Dwelling house, proprietary effluent treatment system, domestic shed and all ancillary siteworks and services
22320
CONSTRUCT A DWELLING HOUSE, PETU, DOMESTIC SHED WITH ALL ASSOCIATED ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
1918
KNOCKING DOWN AND REBUILDING A GARAGE
20396
THE RETENTION OF AN EXTENSION TO EXISTING HOUSE, DOMESTIC GARAGE AND SHED AND VEHICULAR AND SERVICE ENTRANCES, TOGETHER WITH ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
2460669
THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSIST OF THE RE-CONTOURING OF AGRICULTURAL LAND USING IMPORTED BYPRODUCT SOIL AND STONES WITHIN AN AREA OF 5.061 HECTARES FOR THE CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFIT TO AGRICULTURE. PERMISSION IS ALSO SOUGHT FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE EXISTING AGRICULTURAL SITE ACCESS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ERECTION OF SILT FENCES AT ALL WATERCOURSES. A 10 YEAR PLANNING PERMISSION IS REQUESTED DURING WHICH PERIOD APPROXIMATELY 165,000 TONNES OF BYPRODUCT SOIL AND STONES WILL BE IMPORTED FOR THE PURPOSES OF LAND RECLAMATION. THE PLANNING APPLICATION IS ACCOMPANIED BY A NATURA IMPACT STATEMENT.
19909
RETAIN EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE, P79/428 REFERS
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 254 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 23640The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief