Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Dun-Muire , Altamount Street , Westport
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
10% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 731 decisions within 5 km, 6 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 57 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 23650
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage57 structured nearby appeal records.
57 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched731Nearby applications
6Site-linked candidates
10%Nearby refused
57Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
23650
Change of use of existing derelict shed to residential dwelling to include the construction of first floor extension together with all ancillary site works and services
18807
CARRY OUT ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING TOWN HOUSE, A PROTECTED STRUCTURE, TO INCLUDE THE RENOVATION AND EXTENSION TO THE EXISTING REAR KITCHEN AND OUTBUILDINGS, MINOR INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
23373
Construction of a single dwelling, shed and associated site works
21691
DEMOLISH SINGLE STOREY FLAT ROOFED REAR EXTENSION AND CONSTRUCT NEW TWO-STOREY REAR EXTENSION TO EXISTING MID-TERRACED DWELLING
2660262
To Construct A First Floor Extension To The Rear Of Existing Dwelling House, Together With All Site Services At The White House, Fairgreen, Westport, Co. Mayo. F28 DC84
2460374
1. Demolition of existing derelict semi-detached house and shed. 2. Proposed construction of a replacement dwelling house to match the existing foot print with the addition of a side and rear extension on ground floor and rear loft extension. The proposed front elevation is to be rebuilt to match the existing. The proposed development is located within an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). The property has been unoccupied for 10 plus years and currently is not in a liveable condition. A structural engineers detailed inspection and report has highlighted the internal and external walls are suffering from subsidence. This along with other factors we are proposing to demolish the current property and rebuild, matching the front façade of the building to the existing and the adjoining dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 731 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 23650The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief