Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
7% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 210 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 10 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Limerick County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
10 structured nearby appeal records.
10 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Limerick County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
A) demolish rear annex, b) construct a new single storey extension at the rear for use as a dental surgery and associated use, and replace existing entrance door
1) the part demolition of existing buildings (c. 155 sq.m), 2) the as constructed front, rear and side elevations, 3) as constructed site works and services including the rear boundary wall to Pound Lane, & 4) the as constructed alterations and extensions made to the existing ground and first floor SuperValu store and ancillary accommodation (715 sq.m). The proposal involved works to the building known as "Maloney's Garage". The integrated façade of Maloneys Garage is a protected structure, (Ref. PS-ABF-54 P.E.Ab/34) and this façade has been retained as part of the development
The construction of a single storey dwelling house, detached domestic garage, front boundary entrance walls, connection to all public utility services with all associated site works
A single storey dwelling house, detached domestic garage, front boundary entrance walls, connection to all public utility services with all associated site works
Existing balcony as constructed to the rear of the cellar bar which is a Protected Structure (RPS No. 51) with associated works
Existing external seating area/hard landscaped area, revised layout of originally permitted balcony area all as constructed to the rear of the Cellar Bar which is a protected structure(RPS No. 51) with associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 210 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 171108The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief