Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Atlantic Amusements , Strand Road , Tramore
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 673 decisions within 5 km, 18 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 48 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 17717
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage48 structured nearby appeal records.
48 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
673Nearby applications
18Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
48Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
17717
To carry out the following: To install a replacement cantilevered canopy with supporting over head structure to the entire frontage, new illuminated signage, general alterations to all façade elevations, incorporating decorative architectural panels
21415
Indefinite retention of change of use from shop to hot food takeaway premises and for canopy to front elevation at
22162
(1) New Sliding/Folding doors to front elevation to Strand Road, (2) New signage to be mounted on the cantilevered entrance canopy, (3) New Entrance door sets to Casino and apartment over, and all associated site works
20796
For the development comprising of 6 no. 2 bedroom apartments at first floor level and 4 no. 2 bedroom apartments at second floor level, alterations to shopfront at Strand Road, 3 storey access stairs and lift to rear all at the
19209
Development consisting of the installation of an ATM machine to the east elevation of the public toilets building
18667
Indefinite Retention of i) upgraded balcony railings and guardings to comply with building regulations, ii) replacing 2 No. rectangular windows with circular windows on the recessed balcony areas of the first and second floor areas of the building, iii) the replacement of 2 No. velux roof windows with 1 No. velux balcony window. Planning permission is also required for a Juliet style balcony to the second floor level of the buiding and all necessary ancillary works to
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 673 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 17717The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief