Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Highfield Business Park , Mayfield (Or Rocketscastle) , Portlaw
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 212 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 9 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 18370
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage9 structured nearby appeal records.
9 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
212Nearby applications
1Site-linked candidates
11%Nearby refused
9Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
18370
The construction of a light industrial development to consist of 6 individual units, access roadway, carparking, storm water attenuation, connection to foul and surface water drainage systems and all ancillary accommodation and associated site works on site
2560891
The demolition of an existing dug-out, the provision of a covered bicycle stand, the construction of a 200 all-seater stand and all associated site development works
19546
For development consisting of the demolition of existing changing rooms. The construction of a new two storey building with changing rooms on the ground floor and a gym and club facilities on the second floor and all associated site works
211122
Permission is sought for the change of use of an existing out-building from private residential storage to a small-scale microbrewery allowing for the manufacture of packaged beer products
19468
Existing garage and store units for private use and associated site works
19796
The replacement of an existing copper roof covering to the south wing of Woodlock House with a single ply roof membrane in patina green at Woodlock House (A PROTECTED STRUCTURE RPS 176)
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 212 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18370The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief