Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage36 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
36 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,814 decisions within 5 km, 36 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 113 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
36 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
36 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
113 structured nearby appeal records.
113 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Change of use from offices to bar/nightclub with new access through from the existing first floor
An outdoor television with protective door over the archway (A Protected Structure)
Of change of use from restaurant to bar at ground floor
For development consisting of modification of the ground floor shop front feature which will include the removal of existing ground floor windows, the construction of a new traditional original style timber shop front complete with new glazed timber doors and integrated signage, removal of existing projecting signage at first floor level and provision of new projecting signage at this position and other ancillary site works
Section 254 Application for Licence for Two Tables with chairs outside
SECTION 254 - Renew Licence for external tables and chairs permitted under Ref. No. 14/600134
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,814 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18665The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief