Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 716 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 49 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
49 structured nearby appeal records.
49 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Rear extension, permission for side extensions, new entrance porch, elevational changes, new waste water treatment system and percolation area and all associated site works
Changes to permission previously granted under planning reference 18/852 comprising changes to elevations, omission of extension to north and use of CMD Environmental Aquamax waste water treatment unit with Ecoflo Territory Coconut Filter, together with all associated site works
To Filling of outcrops of rocks and ground depressions in an agricultural field with imported sub-soil and topsoil depth between 2m – 6m depending on ground depression not exceeding 24,000 tonnes per annum and permission for new entrance and all associated site works
Filling of outcrops of rocks and ground depressions in an agricultural field with imported sub-soil and topsoil depth between 2m – 6m depending on ground depression not exceeding 24,000 tonnes per annum and permission for new entrance and all associated site works
For the covering outcrops of rock and ground depressions in an agricultural field with imported sub soil and topsoil to an average depth of approximately 2 meters and all associated site works.
To erect a dwelling house with sewage treatment system & all ancillary works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 716 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18852The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief