Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 2,229 decisions within 5 km, 8 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 183 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Limerick County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
183 structured nearby appeal records.
183 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Limerick County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Carrying out a development to include an extension to an existing unit, connections to public sewers and all associated site works
Additional building floor area, as constructed; 101.5m sq to the northern side of units 3 & 4 and 118m sq annex to eastern side of unit 7, minor changes to elevational treatment [as permitted under Planning Ref 06/3510], including the omission of high level windows to the front façade and the provision of a new entrance door and screen to unit 6. Permission is also sought for the amalgamation of units 3, 4, 5 6 & 7, change of use from warehousing units to leisure/sports use facility at units 3, 4, 5 6 & 7, including provision of internal ancillary toilet, changing area and staff facilities with connections to existing waste water infrastructure, erection of external signage to front façade and all associated works
Continued use of the pre-school facility, approved under planning ref. 16/528 & 17/439, also to provide school aged childcare services at the facility and to amalgamate it into unit 1
A change of use of unit 2B from a leisure/exercise facility (planning ref:15/921) back to its original use as a retail warehouse/commercial unit (planning ref:00/2954) and to include all associated works
Construction of a new extension to the rear of the existing unit, alterations to rear(South) elevation to comprise new double doors and external steps and all associated site development works
Construction of a dome type structure to provide for an additional sensory play zone designed to provide fully accessible play zone for children with challenging or additional needs including fully accessible toilets and associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 2,229 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19131The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief