Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Cahermore Holiday Village , Carrowhubbuck South , Enniscrone
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 207 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 8 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1991
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Sligo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Sligo County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Sligo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage8 structured nearby appeal records.
8 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Sligo County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
207Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
5%Nearby refused
8Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1991
For development consisting of the construction of a total twenty-two new holiday homes comprising eight detached, four semi-detached, and two blocks of three houses to complete the existing holiday home development which was previously granted planning permission under planning references PL 04/1351 and PL 06/1006 together with all associated site works and to connect into existing services
2660044
Retention and completion of 2 no. 3 bedroom dwelling houses on site numbers C54 and C55, for connection to existing public services and for all associated site works, previous planning permission reference number 19/91
2660043
Alterations from the housing layout as previously approved under p19/91 from 8 no. 4 bed detached holiday homes to 16 no. 3 bed semi-detached holiday homes, for connection to existing public services and for all associated site works on this site
2132
Development consisting of (1) Construct a 17sq.m lower ground floor extension to the bedrooms and a 7sq.m entry level extension to the utility shed on the west side of the house with balconies over, (2) remove two no. dormer windows and replace with a single zinc clad dormer window on the west elevation, (3) on the north elevation (a) remove the first floor window, (b) install a new lower ground floor window and (c) replace the existing lower ground floor window, (4) widen the porch, (5) construct a bin enclosure beside porch, (6) retain the relocated front door on the porch and the double doors to the utility shed, and (7) carry out all ancillary site works
2360081
To west (front) elevation of house: (1) Construct a new first floor balcony with glass balustrade, (2) Enlarge existing door opening and install larger sliding door, (3) Install a new first floor window,
2560418
To renovate and extend the existing dwelling house, including the construction of a new roof which will be centred over the revised plan, also the provision of a new first floor balcony together with all associated site works and connection into existing services
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 207 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1991The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief