Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Emo Oil Mooncoin Stores , Main Street , Mooncoin
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 288 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 16 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1994
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage16 structured nearby appeal records.
16 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
288Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
16Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1994
For the placement of a pay-to-use portable waste compactor for the acceptance of residual and food waste and a pay-to-use portable waste compactor for mixed recyclables. This activity requires the developers to possess a Waste Collection Permit / Certificate of Registration
19481
Is sought for the brick finish to the front elevation to ground floor level only to 4 number semi-detached two storey 3 bedroom dwellings, all at
19969
For indefinite retention of single storey extension to side of house
2459
For extension to side of existing dwelling house (PROTECTED STRUCTURE Ref. C523)
2585
For garage
2460454
To construct a New Domestic Shed all associated works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 288 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1994The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief