Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
GLASVALLEY , OWER , HEADFORD
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 156 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 3 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 20911
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3 structured nearby appeal records.
3 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched156Nearby applications
1Site-linked candidates
8%Nearby refused
3Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
20911
RETAIN EXISTING DWELLING ON REVISED SITE BOUNDARIES AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE FACILITIES
211039
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE DWELLING HOUSE, PROPRIETARY EFFLUENT TREATMENT UNIT, PERCOLATION AREA AND DOMESTIC GARAGE ALONG WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
21351
1. Retention of (a) the front elevation of existing dwelling house (b) the location of existing septic tank and percolation area on site (c) the location of existing domestic garage on site; 2. A revised site layout plan showing existing development 'as constructed' on proposed new site boundaries and entrance layout (previous planning ref. no. P 03/2859)
19682
RETAIN DWELLING HOUSE, DOMESTIC GARAGE/FUEL STORE WITH ATTIC STORAGE FACILITIES, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, PERCOLATION AREA, EXISTING ENTRANCE/EXIT GATE AT ITS CURRENT LOCATION AND ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS ALL ON REVISED SITE BOUNDARIES FROM THE PREVIOUS PLANNING APPLICATION P05/2895
17955
RETENTION OF A CONSERVATORY TO AN EXISTING DWELLING AND SHEDS ON REVISED SITE BOUNDARIES
2460283
Retention of an existing dwelling, garage/shed, an effluent treatment system and percolation area on revised site boundaries previously granted under planning reference Number P04/1313 & P09/56
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 156 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20911The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief