Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage11 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
11 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 315 decisions within 5 km, 11 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 5 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
11 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
11 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
5 structured nearby appeal records.
5 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PORCH TO THE REAR, AND MINOR REMOVAL WORKS TO ALLOW FOR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING DOOR OPES WITH WINDOWS OPES TO THE REAR AND THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, ALL AT GROUND FLOOR LEVEL; THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL UNIT AND 3 NO. EXISTING APARTMENTS AT GROUND FLOOR TO ACCOMMODATE 1 NO. 1 BED APARTMENT AND 1 NO. 2 BED APARTMENT, WITH MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING ELEVATIONS AND RETENTION OF 3 NO. STUDIO APARTMENTS AT FIRST FLOOR LEVEL. NO CHANGE PROPOSED TO EXISITING SITE LAYOUT OR CAR PARKING LAYOUT
Retention Of 3no. First Floor Studio Apartments
RETENTION AND PERMISSION FOR AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING APARTMENTS, PREVIOUS REF. NO. P91/203 AND P98/66
RETENTION OF 2 NO. 1 BED GROUND FLOOR APARTMENTS AND 3 NO. ONE BED FIRST FLOOR APARTMENTS AS CONSTRUCTED AND PERMISSION FOR CREATION OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS TO GROUND FLOOR APARTMENTS, PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO REAR OF APARTMENTS, AND ERECTION OF EXTERNAL STORAGE SHEDS AND REFUSE COMPOUND, ALONG WITH ALL ASSOCIATED AND ANCILLARY WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT
Construct extension to rear of existing dwelling house together with refurbishment of existing house, demolition of structurally unsound walls together with raising eaves level to front elevation matching neighbouring property and all ancillary site development works
EXTENSION TO EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING, REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING GARDEN TUNNELS, CARPARK, NEW ENTRANCE ACCESS ONTO PUBLIC ROAD, INCLUDING ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SITE SERVICES, TOGETHER WITH RETENTION PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF GROUND WORKS COMMENCED ON SITE
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 315 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 211198The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief