Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 313 decisions within 5 km, 7 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 5 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
5 structured nearby appeal records.
5 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY TO CONSIST OF TWO GROUND FLOOR RETAIL UNITS, TWO FIRST FLOOR APARTMENTS AND TWO SECOND FLOOR APARTMENTS. TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS LODGED
Change of use of the development previously approved under P21/838 to a single domestic dwelling house with one ground floor retail unit together with all ancillary site works and services
Change of use of the ground floor of the existing building from retail use to office use (class 2), alterations to signage on the existing facade and all associated ancillary site works
CHANGE OF USE FROM PREVIOUS RETAIL USE AT GROUND FLOOR LEVEL ONLY TO A COFFEE SHOP/RESTAURANT, THE PROVISION OF SIGNAGE TO THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING AND TO CONSTRUCT CHANGES TO THE REAR ELEVATION IN THE FORM OF NEW WINDOWS ALONG WITH ALL ASSOCIATED SERVICES
CHANGE OF USE FROM A GROUND FLOOR RETAIL UNIT TO USE AS AN APARTMENT, AND FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS
CHANGE OF USE OF PART OF THE EXISTING GROUND FLOOR, FROM USE AS A SHOP TO USE AS A COMMUNITY HUB, INCLUDING ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SERVICES
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 313 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 21838The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief