Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage42 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
42 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 867 decisions within 5 km, 42 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 60 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
42 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
42 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
60 structured nearby appeal records.
60 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
New enclosed bar / reception area to side of existing restaurant including new fenestration, access doors and all associated works at
Indefinite retention of extended single storey flat roofed restaurant area to side of existing restaurant including new fenestration, relocation of access doors and all associated works at
1. Indefinite retention of change of use of first and second floor space from residential space into commercial office and general storage space; 2. Indefinite retention of plastic canopy coverings to rear yard areas (2 no. yards); 3. Indefinite retention of external serving area in beer garden; 4. Provision of new escape door and associated works on first floor level to rear of existing building; 5. Provision of new external metal escape stairs to rear of existing building and all associated works. This is a protected structure located in an area of conservation
Section 254 Licence Application - outdoor screens and canopy covering from rain
SECTION 254 LICENCE for outdoor dining area with 5 x walk-through picnic benches which seats 6 persons per table provided by 360 Cookhouse, parasols provided by Council. Located at Castle Green area beside King Johns Castle & 360 Cookhouse on Castle Street. Tables are 5.3ft long x 5.2ft wide
SECTION 254 LICENCE for outdoor dining area with 5 x walk-through picnic benches which seats 6 persons per table provided by 360 Cookhouse, parasols provided by Council. Located at Castle Green are beside King Johns Castle and 360 Cookhouse on Castle Street. Tables are 5.3 ft long and 5.2 ft wide
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 867 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 221062The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief