Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage30 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
30 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,780 decisions within 5 km, 30 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 128 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
30 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
30 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Louth County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
128 structured nearby appeal records.
128 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Louth County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Permission for development to consist of alterations to condition no. 2 of a previously granted planning application reference number 18724 - Planning permission for change of use from existing unit to 2 no. cafe/restaurant units. We propose that the condition to preclude take away from the principal restaurant/ cafe use to be omitted and that takeaway ancillary to the main restaurnat/ cafe use be allowed.
Planning permission for change of use from existing unit to 2 no. cafe/restaurant units.
Permission for new sign associated with existing car parking area and all associated site development works adjoining the Adelphi Car Park.
Permission for development that will consist of a change of use of an existing retail unit to a restaurant/café use, with associated signage and all site development works
Permission for the redecoration of existing timber shop front to colour grey and replacement of existing shop signage to provide new conservation style signage. This will include a new aluminium fascia, externally illuminated logo pod, strapline text and projection sign
Permission is sought for A) Sub-division of existing groud-floor retail unit, B) Modifications to existing front elevation to provide new doorway entrance, C) Partial change of use of existing ground floor retail unit to medical centre entrance and access corridor, D) Change of use of existing first floor office to new medical centre, E) Provision of 2 no. new windows to rear of proposed first floor medical centre.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,780 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 22852The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief