Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
16% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 208 decisions within 5 km, 10 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 16 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Kerry County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
16 structured nearby appeal records.
16 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Kerry County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
ALTERATIONS TO FRONT FACADE OF EXISTING CAFE AND PLANNING PERMISSION FOR (1) PROPOSED DOOR IN LIEU OF THE EXISTING WINDOW ON SITE ELEVATION (2) FOR PROPOSED CANOPY OVER EXISTING DECK/PATH AREA TO THE FRONT OF THE PREMISES (3) FOR PROPOSED DECORATIVE LARCH FEATURE PANELING TO THE FRONT ELEVATION AND PART OF THE SIDE ELEVATION; AND (4) PROPOSED SIGNAGE TO FRONT ELEVATION
RETAIN ELEVATION CHANGES TO HER TWO STOREY DWELLING OUSE
Permission to (a) Alter and extend the existing dwelling, (b) partial demolition of the existing house, porch and shed, (c) convert the attic space into liveable accommodation, and (d) relocated the front entrance to the side including all associated site works,
(A) DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SINGLE STOREY DETACHED DWELLING, DETACHED SHEDS/OUTBUILDINGS TO REAR AND EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN STEPS AND RAMP TO SIDE (EAST), (B) CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT TWO STOREY DETACHED DWELLING AND REPLACEMENT EXTERNAL PEDESTRIAN STAIRS TO FRONT AND SIDE (EAST), (C) NEW VEHICULAR ENTRANNCE TO FRONT AND (D) ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AT SITE
INSTALL A NEW PUBLIC BAR ENTRANCE DOOR AT THE SOUTHERN GABLE OF THE BUILIDNG
CONSTRUCT A SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION TO THE FRONT OF OUR DWELLING
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 208 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 22972The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief